pelton ALR

Pelton Industrial Proposal

North Lougheed Connector

Sheridan Hill Quarry

Albion Flats

Latest

Pelton Industrial Proposal

The farmland on the Pelton Estate in Maple Ridge was considered for development summer/fall 2010. The Pelton property owners proposed their lands as a site for industrial development. The Peltons proposed to exclude 152.2 acres of land from the ALR to build an industrial site in the area east of 203rd Street to 132nd Avenue. A further 51.7 acres wass slated for other uses, which included a community park/game field, experimental/incubator land, community gardens, an agri-product terminal, horse trailer parking, multi-use trails and 27.7 acres for unidentified non-farm use.

In a poll taken a few years ago, 80% of the population of Maple Ridge wished to see the agricultural character of Maple Ridge protected. In April of 2009, the Pitt Polder Preservation Society handed in a petition of 2,335 signatures opposing industrial development in this area. Councillor Hogarth remarked that it was “silly” to spend a “…lot of energy on something that’s just a discussion” (The News, Friday, April 1/09). Obviously, our reaction was not silly.

Reasons to oppose this development

  1. All the land involved is in the ALR.

  2. The area is surrounded by prime agricultural land.

  3. Although the land has been covered by greenhouse materials, the underlying soil will be the same as that of surrounding farms.

  4. Heritage farms in the area have already had to sacrifice land for the Abernethy Connector.

  5. This plan does not fit with the zoning of the Livable Region Plan.

  6. This plan does not fit with the objectives of the agricultural plan.

  7. Development here will set a precedent for land exclusion of neighbouring properties and ultimately destroy the heritage farms as well.

  8. Development in this area will increase the likelihood of development in neighbouring Pitt Meadows.

  9. The proposed development is outside the urban boundary as identified in the OCP.

  10. The application quoted part of a study which was obtained by Maple Ridge Council during the OCP Review as justification for development on the Pelton property. This study, however, also identified other suitable areas which are publicly-owned and already serviced (256th Street in Maple Ridge).

  11. 27.7 acres of land have been designated for “non-farm” use. The public should be privy to the developer’s plan for this land.

  12. The Peltons still operate “Kitchen Pick,” a culinary herb business (Oppenheimer, grower stories report) which might also benefit from some of the “other uses” being offered to the farming community—i.e. the terminal which would act as distribution and retail hub for agriculture, and the specialty sales area. The money donated to improve farmland drainage (News, May 28, 2020) would also be necessary for an industrial site.

  13. Of the “other uses” that are being proposed to “off-set the loss of agricultural land,” most will be leased to the municipality on a yearly basis, the exception being the sports field which would be donated to the community. The field would remain in the ALR. (News, May 28,2010)

  14. The Pelton’s used the land for “quasi-industrial” purposes for 40 years, yet during that time they paid farm taxes, not industrial taxes. (News, May 18, 2010)

  15. Only 48% of the region’s food requirements are produced in the Metro-Vancouver Area.

  16. Global warming, peak oil, the need for sustainable food lands are major reasons to protect and maintain agricultural land.

  17. The land was/is agricultural and it should be returned to its former ALR use.

  18. The ALR was created to protect agricultural land for future needs.

  19. This is a proposal only. There is no guarantee that this particular proposal will be carried out. The primary purpose of this proposal is to remove this land from the ALR.

Outcome

The Polder Society is conducting a petition in opposition to this ALR exclusion proposal. You can sign the petition and/or request copies to circulate among friends and acquaintances. Petitons are available via Diana Williams - (604) 465-8038 or Peter Jongbloed - (604) 465-4342.

Many letters have been sent to the ALC and there have been requests to hold a public hearing about the removal of this land from the ALR. No hearings or information sessions were held.

The Pelton application was reviewed by the ALC on October 13, 2010, its decision made public on October 27th. The application was refused on the grounds that the land is appropriate for farming. The ALC stated the proposed ALR exclusion would "impact agriculture" in the area (Maple Ridge Times, Oct. 29/10), and confirmed that the application was inconsistent with its mandate of preserving and encouraging agriculture.

The Pitt Polder Preservation Society applauds this decision: it is a refreshing example of ethical decision-making by the ALC. Currently, the Pelton family has no further plans for the property; although, they are able to reapply to the ALC in one year.

Thank You!

A big thank you to everyone who took the time to promote the petition, send letters, attend meetings, and speak out. All of you have been an integral part of the process. We at the Polder Society believe that standing together is the key to making a difference.

top

North Lougheed Connector

The North Lougheed Connector (NLC) is a pending east/west connector that would cut through prime agricultural lands between Lougheed Highway and Old Dewdney Trunk Road. The NLC would sever six lots, four of which are actively farmed right now.

The City of Pitt Meadows is supporting the construction of this road and the Agricultural Land Commission recently responded to this application. The ALC has approved the NLC through these agricultural lands with two conditions. First, land owners must sign covenants that their lands will remain in the ALR. This would prevent commercial development on either side of the connector. Second, the project must be completed within three years. (September 2010)

Currently, there is no funding for the project unless it comes from the developer. The City of Pitt Meadows is seeking a legal opinion on the conditions attached to this road; it would appear that the NLC is not intended as a road to benefit farmers. Smart!Centres developers own more than 29 acres along the proposed NLC route.

The Polder Society is in strong opposition to the NLC as it would undermine agriculture in
this area by subdividing agricultural parcels and encouraging intense land speculation in
Pitt Meadows and adjoining Maple Ridge.

top

Sheridan Hill Quarry

If allowed to expand, Pitt River Quarry operations—the dust and noise, habitat disturbance and destruction—could continue for up to 15 years. Mining activities of Pitt River Quarries Ltd. have completely destroyed the north side of this hill, causing considerable environmental damage and visually defacing a beautiful Pitt Meadows and First Nations landmark.

Besides the environmental devastation that will be caused by increased mining activities, there are geophysical, cultural (Sheridan Hill has spiritual significance to First Nations People), regulatory issues, and the best interests of the public that must be addressed. Pitt River Quarries have stated that they intend to leave the hill tiered and suitable for residential development. This would cause additional long-term environmental and agricultural concerns for the polder, in particular, increased pressure to develop surrounding ALR. Also, the wildlife park donated to Pitt Meadows by Wilma Robinson would be negatively affected. A lawyer from West Coast Environmental Law is examining this case.

top

Albion Flats

While the Albion Flats are located in east Maple Ridge, the Polder Society is watching this case with concern as it may set a strong precedent for development of agricultural lands throughout Maple Ridge.

Smart!Centres, the mall developer in the area, is seeking removal of land from ALR for a large shopping center along Lougheed Highway bordered by Tamarack Lane and 105 Avenue. The developer owns 35 acres in this area.

The City of Maple Ridge is working on an area plan for the Albion Flats before any firm decisions are made on the mall. Currently (fall 2010), discussions and charettes are being held to determine the views of stakeholders. Presentations to Council are scheduled for December.

top